Chelsea Vs Fulham 1-2: Player Ratings

Chartdata

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Dec 27, 2024

37 visitor like this post

Share

Chelsea vs Fulham 1-2: Player Ratings - A Disappointing Defeat

Chelsea's recent 1-2 home defeat to Fulham was a bitter pill to swallow for the Blues. While the scoreline might suggest a closely fought contest, the performance left much to be desired, leaving many fans questioning the team's direction. Let's delve into the individual player ratings to dissect the contributing factors to this disappointing result.

Chelsea Player Ratings:

Goalkeeper:

• Kepa Arrizabalaga (6/10): Kepa made a couple of decent saves, but couldn't prevent both Fulham goals. While not directly at fault, he could arguably have done better on at least one of them. A mixed performance overall.

Defenders:

• Reece James (7/10): One of Chelsea's better performers. Provided consistent attacking threat down the right flank and showed his usual defensive solidity, despite the overall defensive frailties.
• Thiago Silva (6.5/10): A veteran presence, Silva battled hard but couldn't quite contain Fulham's attacking prowess. Showed moments of brilliance, but also looked vulnerable at times.
• Wesley Fofana (5.5/10): Struggled to cope with Fulham's pace and movement. Made some crucial mistakes which led to dangerous situations. Needs to improve his consistency.
• Ben Chilwell (6/10): Offered some attacking support but defensively looked unconvincing at times. Like the rest of the backline, he struggled to deal with the Fulham attack.

Midfielders:

• Enzo Fernandez (7/10): Chelsea's most creative midfielder on the day. Showed glimpses of his talent but was often isolated and lacked sufficient support.
• Conor Gallagher (6/10): Worked hard in midfield but lacked the final ball to create clear-cut chances. His energy was evident, but his impact on the game was limited.
• Mason Mount (5.5/10): A quiet game for Mount, failing to exert his usual influence on proceedings. He needs to rediscover his form and impact on matches.

Forwards:

• Mykhailo Mudryk (6/10): Showed flashes of pace and skill but lacked the final product. Needs to improve his decision-making in the final third.
• Kai Havertz (5/10): A largely ineffective performance. Failed to make a significant contribution and looked isolated upfront. Needs to be more clinical in front of goal.
• Raheem Sterling (6.5/10): Chelsea's most threatening attacker. He consistently attempted to create openings and was a constant menace to the Fulham defense, despite the final result.

Fulham Player Ratings: (Brief Overview)

Fulham, overall, delivered a strong performance, capitalizing on Chelsea's defensive vulnerabilities. Their midfield controlled the tempo, and their forwards were clinical in front of goal. Detailed ratings would require a separate dedicated analysis.

Analysis and Conclusion:

The Chelsea vs Fulham match highlighted several key issues for the Blues: defensive fragility, lack of creativity in midfield, and a lack of clinical finishing upfront. While individual brilliance shone through from players like James and Fernandez, the overall team performance was far from satisfactory. The result underscores the need for significant improvement across multiple facets of the team's play if Chelsea are to achieve their ambitions this season. The manager will need to address these issues swiftly and decisively to avoid further disappointing results.