Fulham's Victory: Chelsea Player Ratings

Chartdata

You need 3 min read

·

Post on Dec 27, 2024

40 visitor like this post

Share

Fulham's Victory: Chelsea Player Ratings - A Disappointing Day at Craven Cottage

Fulham's 3-1 victory over Chelsea at Craven Cottage was a disappointing result for the Blues, leaving fans and pundits alike questioning the team's performance. While there were moments of individual brilliance, the overall team effort lacked cohesion and consistency. Let's delve into the individual player ratings, examining both strengths and weaknesses:

Goalkeeper

Kepa Arrizabalaga (5/10): While Kepa couldn't be blamed for all three goals, he could have done better on at least one occasion. His distribution was also inconsistent, adding to Chelsea's struggles in possession. A shaky performance overall.

Defenders

Reece James (6/10): Offered his usual attacking threat down the right flank, creating a few dangerous crosses. However, defensively he was occasionally caught out of position, contributing to Fulham's attacking success. Needs to find a better balance between attack and defense.

Thiago Silva (7/10): One of Chelsea's better performers. Silva's experience and composure were evident throughout the match. He made crucial interceptions and provided leadership at the back, but even his efforts couldn't entirely compensate for the team's defensive frailties.

Wesley Fofana (5/10): Had a tough game, struggling to cope with Fulham's pace and movement up front. Made several errors leading to dangerous situations, and needs to improve his decision-making.

Ben Chilwell (6/10): Like James, Chilwell provided a decent attacking contribution down the left. His crosses were occasionally accurate but lacked the punch needed to truly threaten the Fulham goal. Defensively, he was fairly solid, but could have been more assertive.

Midfielders

Enzo Fernández (6.5/10): Showed glimpses of his talent, showcasing impressive technical ability and vision. However, he lacked the support needed to exert his usual influence on the game. A strong individual performance in a struggling team.

Conor Gallagher (5/10): Struggled to impose himself on the midfield battle. His passing was often inaccurate, and his defensive contributions were minimal. Needs to significantly improve his overall game.

Mason Mount (6/10): Worked tirelessly, but his impact was limited. He created a few chances, showcasing his skill in tight spaces, but his final ball often let him down. A decent effort but ultimately not enough.

Forwards

Raheem Sterling (5/10): A largely ineffective performance. He lacked his usual pace and trickery, failing to create significant opportunities for himself or his teammates. Needs to rediscover his form quickly.

Kai Havertz (5.5/10): Worked hard but lacked the clinical edge in front of goal. Missed several opportunities to level the score and his overall contribution was underwhelming.

Mykhailo Mudryk (6/10): Showed flashes of brilliance with his dribbling skills, causing Fulham’s defence some problems. However, he needs to be more consistent and improve his decision-making in the final third.

Substitutes

Several substitutes were brought on but didn't significantly alter the course of the game.

Overall Assessment

The defeat highlights several areas where Chelsea need to improve. The defensive vulnerabilities are a major concern, while the lack of creativity and clinical finishing in the final third proved costly. While individual players showed moments of quality, a collective improvement is crucial for Chelsea to return to winning ways. The team's performance lacked the intensity and cohesion needed to compete effectively against a well-organized Fulham side. This match serves as a harsh reminder of the work that lies ahead for Chelsea and their manager.