**Hugh Keevins' Controversial Rangers-Aberdeen Take**

Chartdata

You need 2 min read

·

Post on Oct 27, 2024

54 visitor like this post

Share

Hugh Keevins' Rangers-Aberdeen Take: Controversial or Just Honest?

You know that feeling when you're watching a football match, and the commentator says something that makes you want to throw your remote at the TV? Yeah, that's how a lot of Rangers fans felt after Hugh Keevins' take on the recent Aberdeen game.

The Big Talking Point:

So what did Keevins say that caused such a stir? Basically, he claimed that Rangers were "lucky" to get the win against Aberdeen. He pointed out that Rangers were "not at their best" and that Aberdeen "could have won the game". Some folks took it as a slight against Rangers, while others agreed with Keevins' assessment.

The Case for Keevins:

Let's be honest, Rangers weren't exactly setting the world alight in that match. Aberdeen, despite losing, played with a real "fire in their belly". They created some decent chances, and even had a goal ruled out for offside. If you're looking at it from a neutral standpoint, Keevins' point about Rangers being "lucky" isn't completely off-base.

The Case Against Keevins:

Here's the thing: Rangers are a massive club with a massive fanbase. It's kind of like poking the bear when you suggest they were lucky. And let's face it, most Rangers fans would argue that their team "deserved" the win. They dominated possession and created more chances overall.

The Takeaway:

Whether you agree with Keevins or not, one thing's for sure: he always speaks his mind. Some might say he's being a bit "controversial", but maybe he's just being honest. The beauty of football is that everyone has an opinion, and Keevins isn't afraid to share his. So next time you hear him on the telly, remember: it's just his opinion, and it's all part of the beautiful game.