Lee Kuan Yew's House: Should We Knock It Down or Keep It Standing?
Lee Kuan Yew's house, a modest bungalow in Oxley Road, is a hot topic in Singapore right now. Some folks think it should be demolished, while others believe it should be preserved as a historical monument. It's a tough call, and I get both sides of the argument.
On one hand, Lee Kuan Yew was the founding father of modern Singapore. He's the reason we have this thriving little island nation. He's the reason we can drink our kopi and eat our kaya toast without getting bombed. So, it's understandable that some people want to keep his house as a reminder of his legacy. It's like a museum, a physical embodiment of Singapore's history.
But on the other hand, the house is just a house, right? It's not like it's some ancient temple or a battlefield where important battles were fought. Plus, Lee himself said he didn't want his house to be turned into a museum. He was a pretty humble guy, and I think he'd be happy with a more quiet, dignified way to be remembered.
Maybe the answer is somewhere in between. We could preserve the house, but make it less about Lee Kuan Yew and more about the history of Singapore. We could have exhibits about the challenges he faced, the choices he made, and the impact he had on our lives.
Whatever we decide, it's a weighty issue, and we gotta do it right. This is more than just a house, it's about how we remember our past and shape our future.
So, what do you think? Should Lee Kuan Yew's house be demolished or preserved? Share your thoughts in the comments below!