Ukraine Can Win Without Long-Range Missiles, Pentagon Chief Says
Hold up, what? That's what everyone's thinking after the Pentagon chief dropped this bombshell. You see, Ukraine's been begging for long-range missiles to take out Russian targets deep behind enemy lines, and it's kinda understandable – they're trying to win a war, right?
But the Pentagon's saying, "Nope, you don't need them." They're betting on Ukraine's current tactics – using drones and artillery to pick off Russian forces – to work just fine, even without those big-time missiles. This is a big deal, because it basically means the US isn't jumping on board with giving Ukraine those weapons just yet.
So, why the hesitation? Well, the Pentagon's worried about escalating the war. Giving Ukraine long-range missiles could be seen as a direct attack on Russia, and that's a whole can of worms the US is trying to avoid. They're also concerned about Russia's reaction – imagine if they retaliated with even more aggressive tactics? It's a delicate situation, to say the least.
But here's the thing: While the Pentagon says Ukraine can win without these missiles, they're also making it clear they're not against sending them in the future. It's just a matter of timing and risk assessment.
Now, it's important to remember that this is a big call. Ukraine's been pushing hard for these weapons, and many experts agree they'd be a game-changer. But, the Pentagon's worried about the consequences. It's a tough call, and it's gonna be interesting to see how this plays out.
One thing's for sure: This war is gonna be a long and bumpy ride, and the world's gonna be watching every move. Let's hope things don't go too sideways.