Wolves v City: Legal Winning Goal? Was that Goal Legit?
You know how it is, man. You're watching the game, glued to the TV, and then BAM! City scores! But wait, was it actually a goal? That's the question that's been buzzing around since the Wolves v City match.
It's all about that last-minute winner, folks. Erling Haaland, the goal-scoring machine, poked the ball past Jose Sa. But hold up, was there a foul on Matheus Cunha just before? This is what everyone's debating.
Let's break it down.
The ref, Michael Oliver, didn't blow his whistle. VAR, the video assistant referee, didn't intervene. So, the goal stood. But was that the right call?
Some say it was a clear foul on Cunha. He was tangled up with Ruben Dias, and there was definitely some pushing and shoving going on. Others argue that it was a fair challenge, and Cunha went down a bit easily.
The problem is, it was a super close call. It's one of those situations that's hard to judge in real time, even for the ref. VAR is there to help, but it's not foolproof.
So, what's the verdict?
We're not gonna lie, it was a tough one. It could have gone either way. Some people are upset with the ref, while others think he got it right. We're just gonna have to agree to disagree on this one.
But hey, at least it was a thrilling match, right? And let's be honest, Haaland's goal was a beauty, even if it was a bit controversial.
Here's the thing: We can't take the drama out of football. It's part of what makes it so exciting! So, even if the goal was questionable, it certainly made for a memorable game.
Now, it's your turn: What do you think? Was the goal legal? Let us know in the comments below.